The Real Cause of Conflict Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The Real deliver of Conflict - Essay ExampleOver the years several psychologists have developed tests to evidence and strike the different personality types, including Jung, Myers-Briggs and the Big Five Personality Tests, which is now the most extensively acknowledged and apply model of personality. The Big Five was developed in the 1970s by two different research studies which though completed differently came to similar conclusions that a majority of personality traits washbasin be defined chthonic five broad themes, extroversion, emotional stability, orderliness, accommodation and intellect. All opposite personality traits can be tally to one of these independent personality traits (Howard & Howard, 2007). However, there is a weakness with this theory, as researchers have not been adapted to completely agree on what exactly the fundamental aspect of each personality trait is (Howard & Howard, 2007). nation frequently seek and admire personalities that atomic number 18 d ifferent from their own, and cosmos appreciative to these positive attributes they have whitethorn hinder them to realise it could pay off stress and be a significant contributor to disagreements. Usually muckle seek out individuals who fill these personality differences, in which to have personal or starting relationships with. A lot of people who have personalities where they are exceptionally well-organized are often drawn to partners who have a takeence to handling situations in an easy going and effortless manner. In comparison rational, sensible thinkers prefer affectionate, sensitive partners, and vibrant extroverts may have a preference for strong, quiet people (Landau & Landau, 1997). The same can be apparent in working relationships between co-workers. This is most likely because they perceive their counterparts as being more relaxed at managing situations they themselves would find hard to achieve (Landau & Landau, 1997). As Smallwood (2009) states, differences in in dividual personalities can work to an advantage in teamwork, as there is an chance for the team members to merge together, not in the eccentric person that everyone thinks the same and agrees, but that everyones individual strengths and abilities can work together to create a stronger, and more efficient conclusion or solution to the problem they are working on. HowveHHowever, these personality differences can also cause significant problems when working in a team, as they clash quite a than compliment each other (Smallwood, 2009). These problems may occur when one individual feels that their way is the only right way to do something. However, as evidence shows there is always more than one way to reach the same result, and an individual can mark a lot from watching how another person achieves these results. Smallwood (2009) suggests that teams do require different personalities to produce an effectual work environment where the different attitudes and abilities produce an effe ctive whole, from its different parts however, it is easy for an individual to suffer judgemental of another team member who does a task in a different way from which they would, rather than appreciating the differences. In addition, team members will sometimes judge the behaviour of a co-worker, by assuming they are feeling a certain way because of their outward behaviour. For example, if a co-worker is quiet, the individual may scoop that they are angry, as this is how they